Files
SolidScribe/server/tests/helpers/Schema.test.js
T
2026-11-03 12:53:17 -07:00

244 lines
8.1 KiB
JavaScript

require('module-alias/register')
const Schema = require('@helpers/Schema')
const db = require('@config/database')
afterAll(() => {
db.end()
})
afterEach(() => {
Schema.__reset()
})
describe('verifyScrapeSchema against the real dev schema', () => {
test('reports ok once the migration has been applied', async () => {
const result = await Schema.verifyScrapeSchema()
if (!result.ok) {
throw new Error(
`dev scrape schema not applied - run ./migrateDatabase.sh. ` +
`missing objects: ${result.missingObjects.join(', ') || 'none'}; ` +
`missing privileges: ${result.missingPrivileges.join(', ') || 'none'}`
)
}
expect(result.missingObjects).toEqual([])
expect(result.missingPrivileges).toEqual([])
expect(result.remedy).toBe('')
})
test('isScrapeSchemaReady reflects the last verification', async () => {
expect(Schema.isScrapeSchemaReady()).toBe(false)
await Schema.verifyScrapeSchema()
expect(Schema.isScrapeSchemaReady()).toBe(true)
Schema.__reset()
expect(Schema.isScrapeSchemaReady()).toBe(false)
})
test('__setReady is honoured, so request paths can be driven in tests', () => {
Schema.__setReady(true)
expect(Schema.isScrapeSchemaReady()).toBe(true)
Schema.__setReady(false)
expect(Schema.isScrapeSchemaReady()).toBe(false)
})
})
//
// The FULLTEXT index is the one object whose loss is silent: MATCH..AGAINST
// against a BTREE index returns nothing without erroring. Guard it by type.
//
describe('FULLTEXT index guard', () => {
test('attachment_text_index exists and is actually FULLTEXT', async () => {
await expect(Schema.__fulltextIndexExists('attachment', 'attachment_text_index'))
.resolves.toBe(true)
})
test('a BTREE index of the same shape would NOT satisfy the check', async () => {
// attachment_scrape_state is a real BTREE index, so this proves the
// check discriminates on type rather than just on name existing.
await expect(Schema.__indexExists('attachment', 'attachment_scrape_state'))
.resolves.toBe(true)
await expect(Schema.__fulltextIndexExists('attachment', 'attachment_scrape_state'))
.resolves.toBe(false)
})
test('verifyScrapeSchema includes it among the verified objects', async () => {
const result = await Schema.verifyScrapeSchema()
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
expect(result.missingObjects).toEqual([])
})
test('MATCH..AGAINST actually works, not just that an index exists', async () => {
// The functional end of the guard. An index of the right type that
// somehow could not be searched would still be a broken search.
const [rows] = await db.promise().query(
`SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM attachment
WHERE MATCH(text) AGAINST(? IN NATURAL LANGUAGE MODE)`,
['the']
)
// Any result (including 0 matches) proves the query planner accepted
// MATCH..AGAINST against this column, which a BTREE index would reject.
expect(typeof rows[0].n).toBe('number')
})
})
describe('object existence checks', () => {
test('finds the real table, columns and index', async () => {
await expect(Schema.__tableExists('scrape_cache')).resolves.toBe(true)
await expect(Schema.__columnExists('attachment', 'scrape_state')).resolves.toBe(true)
await expect(Schema.__columnExists('attachment', 'scrape_attempts')).resolves.toBe(true)
await expect(Schema.__columnExists('attachment', 'enqueued_at')).resolves.toBe(true)
await expect(Schema.__indexExists('attachment', 'attachment_scrape_state')).resolves.toBe(true)
})
test('reports absence rather than throwing for things that do not exist', async () => {
await expect(Schema.__tableExists('no_such_table_xyz')).resolves.toBe(false)
await expect(Schema.__columnExists('attachment', 'no_such_column_xyz')).resolves.toBe(false)
await expect(Schema.__indexExists('attachment', 'no_such_index_xyz')).resolves.toBe(false)
})
})
//
// The privilege check is what turns a future narrow-grants problem into one
// clear boot message instead of a swallowed runtime failure.
//
describe('parseGrants', () => {
const DB = 'application'
const TABLES = ['attachment', 'scrape_cache']
const parse = (lines) => Schema.parseGrants(lines, DB, TABLES)
test('ALL PRIVILEGES ON *.* grants everything', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON *.* TO `root`@`localhost` WITH GRANT OPTION'])
expect(granted.has('SELECT')).toBe(true)
expect(granted.has('INSERT')).toBe(true)
expect(granted.has('UPDATE')).toBe(true)
expect(granted.has('DELETE')).toBe(true)
})
test('ALL PRIVILEGES scoped to the database grants everything', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON `application`.* TO `app`@`localhost`'])
expect(granted.has('DELETE')).toBe(true)
})
test('reads an explicit privilege list', () => {
const granted = parse([
'GRANT USAGE ON *.* TO `app`@`localhost`',
'GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON `application`.* TO `app`@`localhost`',
])
expect([...granted].sort()).toEqual(['DELETE', 'INSERT', 'SELECT', 'UPDATE'])
})
// The case that caused this whole change class.
test('spots a missing DELETE', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON `application`.* TO `app`@`localhost`'])
expect(granted.has('UPDATE')).toBe(true)
expect(granted.has('DELETE')).toBe(false)
})
test('accepts table-scoped grants for our tables', () => {
const granted = parse([
'GRANT SELECT, DELETE ON `application`.`attachment` TO `app`@`localhost`',
'GRANT INSERT, UPDATE ON `application`.`scrape_cache` TO `app`@`localhost`',
])
expect([...granted].sort()).toEqual(['DELETE', 'INSERT', 'SELECT', 'UPDATE'])
})
test('ignores grants on an unrelated database', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON `somethingelse`.* TO `app`@`localhost`'])
expect(granted.size).toBe(0)
})
test('ignores USAGE, which conveys no privileges', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT USAGE ON *.* TO `app`@`localhost`'])
expect(granted.size).toBe(0)
})
test('handles grants written without backticks', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT SELECT, DELETE ON application.* TO app@localhost'])
expect(granted.has('DELETE')).toBe(true)
})
test('strips column-level qualifiers', () => {
const granted = parse(['GRANT SELECT (id, url), UPDATE (text) ON `application`.`attachment` TO `app`@`localhost`'])
expect(granted.has('SELECT')).toBe(true)
expect(granted.has('UPDATE')).toBe(true)
})
test('ignores lines that are not grant statements', () => {
expect(parse(['', 'not a grant line', null]).size).toBe(0)
})
})
//
// The regression that matters most.
//
// Schema.js used to issue CREATE TABLE / ALTER TABLE through the application's
// own connection pool, which failed on production's least-privilege user with
// "CREATE command denied to user 'app'@'localhost'". Nothing in this module may
// ever issue DDL again.
//
describe('issues no DDL', () => {
test('verifyScrapeSchema runs only read-only statements', async () => {
const statements = []
// db.promise() hands back a NEW wrapper on every call, so spying on one
// instance would miss the one Schema.js obtains internally. Intercept
// the factory and instrument each wrapper it returns.
const realPromise = db.promise.bind(db)
const spy = jest.spyOn(db, 'promise').mockImplementation(() => {
const wrapper = realPromise()
const originalQuery = wrapper.query.bind(wrapper)
wrapper.query = (sql, params) => {
statements.push(String(sql))
return originalQuery(sql, params)
}
return wrapper
})
await Schema.verifyScrapeSchema()
spy.mockRestore()
expect(statements.length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
const forbidden = /\b(CREATE|ALTER|DROP|TRUNCATE|RENAME)\b/i
const offenders = statements.filter(statement => forbidden.test(statement))
expect(offenders).toEqual([])
})
test('the module source contains no DDL outside comments', () => {
const fs = require('fs')
const path = require('path')
const source = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', 'helpers', 'Schema.js'), 'utf8'
)
const code = source
.split('\n')
.filter(line => !line.trim().startsWith('//'))
.join('\n')
expect(code).not.toMatch(/\bCREATE\s+TABLE\b/i)
expect(code).not.toMatch(/\bALTER\s+TABLE\b/i)
expect(code).not.toMatch(/\bCREATE\s+INDEX\b/i)
expect(code).not.toMatch(/\bDROP\b/i)
})
})